Selecting Impact Outcome Evaluation Designs: A Decision-Making Table and Checklist Approach

Table Of Content

• Materials and methods
• Explore content
• The elements of key importance to be sure that the recommendations from an evaluation are used are:
• Title:MIMO in network simulators: Design, implementation and evaluation of single-user MIMO in ns-3 5G-LENA
• Mixing Methods for Analytical Depth and Breadth
• How do you evaluate a specific program?

Program theories (whether explicit or tacit) guide the design and implementation of policy interventions and also constitute an important basis for evaluation. Most public health programs aim to change behavior in one or more target groups and to create an environment that reinforces sustained adoption of these changes, with the intention that changes in environments and behaviors will prevent and control diseases and injuries. Through evaluation, you can track these changes and, with careful evaluation designs, assess the effectiveness and impact of a particular program, intervention, or strategy in producing these changes. One of the motivations for developing this new framework was to answer calls for a change in research priorities, towards allocating greater effort and funding to research that can have the optimum impact on healthcare or population health outcomes. The framework challenges the view that unbiased estimates of effectiveness are the cardinal goal of evaluation. It asserts that improving theories and understanding how interventions contribute to change, including how they interact with their context and wider dynamic systems, is an equally important goal.

Materials and methods

Think carefully about the frequency and timing of your observations and the amount of different kinds of information you can collect. With repeated measures, you can get you quite an accurate picture of the effectiveness of your program from a simple time series design. Single group interrupted time series designs, which are often the most workable for small organizations, can give you a very reliable evaluation if they’re structured well. What distinguishes program evaluation from ongoing informal assessment is that program evaluation is conducted according to a set of guidelines. Evaluation should be practical and feasible and conducted within the confines of resources, time, and political context.

Explore content

Theft of cultural elements—including symbols, art, language, customs, etc.—for one’s own use, commodification, or profit, often without understanding, acknowledgement,or respect for its value in the original culture. Results from the assumption of a dominant (i.e. white) culture’s right to take other cultural elements. In other words, you’ll use more advanced tools and processes that allow you to be more confident in your results. Sample sizes get larger, the number of measurement tools increases, and assessments are often standardized and norm-referenced (designed to compare an individual’s score to a particular population). There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of themost exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

The elements of key importance to be sure that the recommendations from an evaluation are used are:

If you were to skip ahead to a later-stage study, you might be disappointed to find that your outcomes aren’t changing because of problems with feasibility and acceptability, or because your targets aren’t changing (or aren’t changing enough). The appropriate evaluation design for answering questions about feasibility and acceptability is typically a feasibility study with a relatively small sample and a simple data collection process. Participants were likely to be satisfied with the entertaining features embedded in the gamified online role-play.

Professional development

This section describes different types of evaluation designs and outlines advantages and disadvantages of each. Many alternative designs can also be created by adding a comparison group, follow-up test, retrospective pretest, and/or intermediate testing to the designs identified below. Rapid Cycle Evaluation (RCE) can be used to efficiently assess implementation and inform program improvement. This brief provides an introduction to RCE, describing what it is, how it compares to other methods, when and how to use it, and includes more in-depth resources.

Chlorquinaldol-zinc(II)-bipyridine complexes: Design, synthesis, structure and anticancer evaluation - ScienceDirect.com

Chlorquinaldol-zinc(II)-bipyridine complexes: Design, synthesis, structure and anticancer evaluation.

Posted: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:22:52 GMT [source]

Evidence must be carefully considered from a number of different stakeholders' perspectives to reach conclusions that are well -substantiated and justified. Conclusions become justified when they are linked to the evidence gathered and judged against agreed-upon values set by the stakeholders. Stakeholders must agree that conclusions are justified in order to use the evaluation results with confidence.

On the other hand, if your program operates without a particular beginning and end, you may get the best picture of its effectiveness by evaluating it as it is, starting whenever you’re ready. Whatever the case, your design should follow your information gathering and synthesis. If you’re designing a program from scratch and implementing it for the first time, you’ll almost always need to begin by establishing feasibility and acceptability. However, suppose you’ve been implementing a program for some time, even without a formal evaluation.

The lesson here is to begin by determining the best design possible for your purposes, without regard to resources. You may have to settle for somewhat less, but if you start by aiming for what you want, you’re likely to get a lot closer to it than if you assume you can’t possibly get it. There are other reasons that participants might object to observation, or at least intense observation.

How do you evaluate a specific program?

Where needed to support the research questions, prespecified subgroup analyses should be carried out and reported. Even where such analyses are underpowered, they should be included in the protocol because they might be useful for subsequent meta-analyses, or for developing hypotheses for testing in further research. Outcome measures could capture changes to a system rather than changes in individuals. Examples include changes in relationships within an organisation, the introduction of policies, changes in social norms, or normalisation of practice. Such system level outcomes include how changing the dynamics of one part of a system alters behaviours in other parts, such as the potential for displacement of smoking into the home after a public smoking ban. For instance, both supporters and skeptics of the program could be consulted to ensure that the proposed evaluation questions are politically viable.

For example, it is important to include those who would be affected if program services were expanded, altered, limited, or ended as a result of the evaluation. While there are some solutions that preserve the integrity of experimental design, another option is to use a quasi-experimental design. These designs make comparisons between nonequivalent groups and do not involve random assignment to intervention and control groups. Research Methods Knowledge Base is a comprehensive web-based textbook that provides useful, comprehensive, relatively simple explanations of how statistics work and how and when specific statistical operations are used and help to interpret data. Interrupted Time Series Quasi-Experiments is an essay by Gene Glass, from Arizona State University, on time series experiments, distinction between experimental and quasi-experimental approaches, etc. You may be able to overcome these obstacles, or you may have to compromise – fewer or different kinds of observations, a less intrusive design – in order to be able to conduct the evaluation at all.

In this section, we’ll look at some of the ways you might structure an evaluation to examine whether your program is working, and explore how to choose the one that best meets your needs. We offer tools, research, tips, curricula, and ideas for people who want to increase their own understanding and to help those working for racial justice at every level – in systems, organizations, communities, and the culture at large. Structural racialization connotes the dynamic process that creates cumulative and durable inequalities based on race.

You may decide based on your questions that one "type" or a combination of the types fits best with your research goals. Please mark as True those outcome evaluation questions you think the team should move forward with in their evaluation. If you have built a detailed logic model for the program, this can be a helpful tool to assist in determining where to best focus your evaluation. To generate discussion around evaluation planning and implementation, several states have formed evaluation advisory panels. Advisory panels typically generate input from local, regional, or national experts otherwise difficult to access. Such an advisory panel will lend credibility to your efforts and prove useful in cultivating widespread support for evaluation activities.

Evaluation results are always bounded by the context in which the evaluation was conducted. Some stakeholders, however, may be tempted to take results out of context or to use them for different purposes than what they were developed for. For instance, over-generalizing the results from a single case study to make decisions that affect all sites in a national program is an example of misuse of a case study evaluation. Giving and receiving feedback creates an atmosphere of trust among stakeholders; it keeps an evaluation on track by keeping everyone informed about how the evaluation is proceeding. Primary intended users and other stakeholders have a right to comment on evaluation decisions. From a standpoint of ensuring use, stakeholder feedback is a necessary part of every step in the evaluation.

However, they were excluded if they had previous involvement in the pilot testing of the gamified online role-play or if they were not fluent in the Thai language. The sample size was determined using a formula for two dependent samples (comparing means)37. To detect a difference in self-perceived confidence and awareness between pre- and post-assessments at a power of 90% and a level of statistical significance of 1%, five participants were required. With an assumed dropout rate of 20%, the number of residents per year (Year 1–3) was set to be 6.

It is predicated on the belief that an organization will grow in whatever direction its stakeholders pay primary attention to such that if all the attention is focused on problems, identifying them would be easy. This type of evaluation is also known as end-term evaluation of project-completion evaluation and it is conducted immediately after the completion of a project. Here, the researcher examines the value and outputs of the program within the context of the projected results. Formative evaluation or baseline survey is a type of evaluation research that involves assessing the needs of the users or target market before embarking on a project. Formative evaluation is the starting point of evaluation research because it sets the tone of the organization’s project and provides useful insights for other types of evaluation.

Qualitative observation is a research method that allows the evaluation researcher to gather useful information from the target audience through a variety of subjective approaches. This method is more extensive than quantitative observation because it deals with a smaller sample size, and it also utilizes inductive analysis. Surveys usually consist of close-ended questions that allow the evaluative researcher to gain insight into several  variables including market coverage and customer preferences. Surveys can be carried out physically using paper forms or online through data-gathering platforms like Formplus. In gathering useful data for evaluation research, the researcher often combines quantitative and qualitative research methods.